Thank you.
I want to clarify some aspects. You mentioned the importance of redress and being able to refer to an independent body in the event of mistaken identity or erroneous information. Hopefully I'm not misstating what was expressed, but when I asked CBSA the question about what type of redress system would be in place, they essentially seemed to imply that the person would have to deal with whatever government agency was in question.
For example, if you were looking at a situation with regard to old age security and you felt that somehow some issue was brought up about when you actually left the country, you would have to deal with the ministry responsible for administering OAS as opposed to having any proper recourse with regard to CBSA.
Do you feel that this is accurate, and if so, do you think we can amend the bill or bring in even larger changes beyond the scope of this to make sure that CBSA remains accountable for the accuracy of that information?