Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'd also like to thank the four witnesses today. I think this has given us a lot of alarming information, no doubt, but it will also enrich our study.
I'll put my question to Ms. Rioux, to Ms. Jeshani, and then to the other witnesses, if we have time.
I'd like to understand one thing better. It's often said that the police's hands are tied. They say it's a problem associated with the justice system. The justice system is very vast. It's often said that the administration of justice falls under provincial jurisdiction, but at the federal level, we manage the Criminal Code as well as the family courts.
When we talk about reforming the bail system, that's also under provincial jurisdiction. So I'd like to understand one thing better. I'd like to address both Ms. Rioux and Ms. Jeshani. As for definitions, we've talked about definitions of parental alienation, reunification therapy and, obviously, coercive control.
How can we clearly define the role of the federal government in family courts?
Can you try to explain the federal and provincial roles in this area?
I put the question first to Ms. Rioux and Ms. Jeshani, and then to Ms. Polzin‑Holman and Ms. Neto.