Thank you, Madam Chair.
Ms. Huntjens, once again, thank you very much for coming to speak to us. My thanks also go to Ms. Prévost and Ms. Brunot.
As I said earlier, there is a health challenge. Let's also remember that there are things the federal government can intervene in, such as research and drug approvals. However, one thing that is not up to us is how the health care system is applied.
However, I would remind you that, when we talk about the need for doctors, it also means giving the health care system more resources. On that note, we are hoping for more transfers in recognition of everything that health system specialists do. We need to give Quebec and the provinces more breathing room and more financial resources for health care.
I would like to come back to another, broader aspect that, as I said, is the economic issue.
Ms. Prévost, I understand that you proposed three recommendations: better information, better support and better training. Beyond that, let's talk about the economic effects in the workplace. Ms. Prévost, you can answer first, and if Ms. Brunot wants to add something, she can.
We've talked a lot about workplace accommodation, but also about menstrual leave more generally.
If there were menstrual leave, should we also think about providing specific leave for women who experience more serious consequences related to perimenopause and menopause?
Are there employment insurance benefits that could help women take care of themselves for a while?
Where should we start to help them economically?
