There are many areas. Hearing loss and tinnitus is a condition that is subjective. Once they have their entitlement, I see many veterans who start out at 2%, 4% or 6%, and they're coming back three and four times when they talk to their buddies and find out that they need a masking device at night. They probably already use a masking device in the form of a sleeping pill or a radio to go to sleep at night. If it is so subjective, which it is, why don't you just grant the tinnitus claims and then come up with an assessment that's comparable to what it is now from 0% to 11%, and if you've got it, you get it? If you don't have it, you don't get it. That's one easy way to take the tinnitus claims out instead of always coming back for an assessment.
As for PTSD, there are many conditions that are linked to PTSD once you start taking medication, so they're now looking at that because they'll will do one mental health condition and then they're coming back with GERD, or erectile dysfunction. Instead of doing another full application, just provide the diagnosis and have it linked to it.
Another part is departmental reviews. Three years ago, departmental reviews on Agent Orange.... The previous chair of VRAB returned them all to the department. They are still sitting with the department over two years later, and our veterans are very disgruntled.
When they write to the department, the department goes back and tells them that it's because of the backlog. It's not because of the backlog; it's in legal review. Be upfront, be transparent, and tell them why it's not being done, or do something about it. Just be transparent.
It's the same with the wait time tool. Let the veteran know what month you're working on. You're working on August 2018 on single condition, first applications. Tell them that, and then use the wait time tool from there. Just be transparent. The veteran will be happier. It will be in the ballpark, because right now we're throwing darts at a board as to when to expect a decision.