Evidence of meeting #87 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was capital.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Geoff Trueman  Director, Business Income Tax Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Ted Cook  Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Shawn Porter  Director, Tax Legislation, Department of Finance
Ian Pomroy  Senior Tax Policy Officer, Social Tax Policy, Personal Income Tax Division, Department of Finance
Pierre Mercille  Senior Legislative Chief, Sales Tax Division, GST Legislation, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Kei Moray  Director, Intergovernmental Tax Policy, Evaluation and Research Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Annie Hardy  Chief, Financial Institutions Division, Structural Issues, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Jane Pearse  Director, Financial Institutions Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Jean-François Girard  Senior Project Leader, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Wayne Foster  Director, Financial Markets Division, Department of Finance
Dominique LaSalle  Director General, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
Marianna Giordano  Director, CPP Policy and Legislation, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
Krista Campbell  Director General, Strategic Policy Branch, Department of Industry

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Rodger Cuzner Liberal Cape Breton—Canso, NS

Do we have an indication what this is going to cost those it impacts?

4:15 p.m.

Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Ted Cook

As I indicated, there's approximately 7,500, and in fiscal costs once it's fully phased in, it's $95 million.

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Rodger Cuzner Liberal Cape Breton—Canso, NS

Has there been any thought or study done regarding its impact on border towns, on people who work cross-border?

4:15 p.m.

Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Ted Cook

There's been no specific analysis with respect to that. At the time this was originally introduced, other jurisdictions had the same type of incentive for their businesses. Over time, those incentives, to the extent we can track them, seemed to have gone away in other countries as well. For example, when this measure was first introduced, the U.K. had a similar measure. Over the years, that measure has been pared back in the U.K. to the point where it now just applies with respect to seamen.

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Rodger Cuzner Liberal Cape Breton—Canso, NS

Would mining and oil be the largest constituency it would impact?

4:15 p.m.

Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Ted Cook

It's certainly targeted to particular types of activities: engineering, oil and gas, agriculture, and that kind of thing. The other thing to note about the credit, and why we feel it's appropriate to phase it out, is there has been a judicial expansion of the credit beyond what we consider its appropriate policy bounds. There have been recent cases where, for example, you've got teachers who are teaching at colleges outside Canada, and they now have been found by the courts to be eligible for the credit, which is beyond where we originally thought the credit was going to apply. There's another case where, by virtue of the fact that a recruiting service was the nominal employer, the individual was eligible for it. Certainly, we've noticed an expansion of the credit and whom it's available to without any change in the legislation as to who claims it.

4:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Cuzner.

Mr. Harris, please.

4:15 p.m.

NDP

Dan Harris NDP Scarborough Southwest, ON

This should be quick. You mentioned that when it was initially created, it provided a bit of a competitive advantage, and if other jurisdictions had themselves moved away from this, would that not have enhanced the competitive advantage of those tax credits?

4:20 p.m.

Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Ted Cook

As I indicated, certainly from our own analysis and that of the CRA, the way the credit works and the way it's been used in the last several years has been creating problems in terms of its going beyond the intended scope, even if it does have a policy purpose. In terms of the competitiveness of Canadian business, the reduction in rates, certainly since the credit was originally introduced in 1979, has more than made up for the incentive that the credit originally provided.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Dan Harris NDP Scarborough Southwest, ON

You mentioned that the expansion of eligibility for the credit has happened in ways that weren't anticipated or that weren't initially supposed to be part of it. Did those changes happen because of a shift in some market forces where suddenly different types of Canadian companies were doing more work overseas, as opposed to those it was originally intended for?

4:20 p.m.

Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Ted Cook

I think it's more a case of Canadian taxpayers seeing that the legislation has been drafted in a particular way and trying to see what works and finding judicial support over time. Once one or two cases show that a provision has been interpreted by the courts in a particular way, then other taxpayers will look at the same decisions and extrapolate from them.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Dan Harris NDP Scarborough Southwest, ON

Certainly I think people see judicial decisions being made and would make use of them.

That, I think, is going to be it for me.

However, $95 million does seem to be a lot of money to be getting out of such a small group of Canadians. When averaged, how much does the government expect to get back from those 7,500 Canadians?

4:20 p.m.

Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Ted Cook

It would be the calculated number of that by the number of taxpayers, perhaps with some factor for increase over the—

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Dan Harris NDP Scarborough Southwest, ON

Sorry. Is the amount of $95 million after it's all been completely phased in, or is that the number it would be in 2013?

4:20 p.m.

Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Ted Cook

That's after it's completely phased in, at the end of the—

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Dan Harris NDP Scarborough Southwest, ON

That's after 2015.

4:20 p.m.

Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Ted Cook

That's after the complete removal of the credit.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Dan Harris NDP Scarborough Southwest, ON

Thank you.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Thank you.

Are there any questions regarding income tax measures dealing with pooled registered pension plans and income received from retirement compensation arrangements?

Monsieur Mai.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

With respect to the impact of income splitting, have you evaluated the loss of revenue?

November 1st, 2012 / 4:20 p.m.

Ian Pomroy Senior Tax Policy Officer, Social Tax Policy, Personal Income Tax Division, Department of Finance

Yes. It would be a relatively small cost. It would be less than $5 million.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

How many people could participate in that?

4:20 p.m.

Senior Tax Policy Officer, Social Tax Policy, Personal Income Tax Division, Department of Finance

Ian Pomroy

I don't have that number available. I'm sorry.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

How did you come up with $5 million?

4:20 p.m.

Senior Tax Policy Officer, Social Tax Policy, Personal Income Tax Division, Department of Finance

Ian Pomroy

I don't have it with me today. I would have to see if we could provide it.