Evidence of meeting #87 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was capital.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Geoff Trueman  Director, Business Income Tax Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Ted Cook  Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Shawn Porter  Director, Tax Legislation, Department of Finance
Ian Pomroy  Senior Tax Policy Officer, Social Tax Policy, Personal Income Tax Division, Department of Finance
Pierre Mercille  Senior Legislative Chief, Sales Tax Division, GST Legislation, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Kei Moray  Director, Intergovernmental Tax Policy, Evaluation and Research Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Annie Hardy  Chief, Financial Institutions Division, Structural Issues, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Jane Pearse  Director, Financial Institutions Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Jean-François Girard  Senior Project Leader, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Wayne Foster  Director, Financial Markets Division, Department of Finance
Dominique LaSalle  Director General, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
Marianna Giordano  Director, CPP Policy and Legislation, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
Krista Campbell  Director General, Strategic Policy Branch, Department of Industry

November 1st, 2012 / 5:10 p.m.

Marianna Giordano Director, CPP Policy and Legislation, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

It is the Review Tribunal and the...

5:10 p.m.

Director General, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Dominique LaSalle

That is it. So we want the bodies to have the authority to hear such cases.

5:10 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

There is also the matter of payment to be made within 30 days of termination of employment. Why was the period for making such payments set at 30 days?

5:10 p.m.

Director General, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Dominique LaSalle

The clause to which I think you are referring is designed to clarify the contribution period, now that there is what is called in English the post-retirement benefit. There is the normal contribution period when people begin to receive their pension. Afterwards they accumulate a new benefit, if you like, which is called the...

5:10 p.m.

Director, CPP Policy and Legislation, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Marianna Giordano

It is the post-retirement benefit.

5:10 p.m.

Director General, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Dominique LaSalle

This simply aims to clarify at what time the contributions apply for the regular pension and at what time we stop and count for the post-retirement benefit.

5:10 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

I know that there have been some changes respecting holidays. More specifically, changes have been made in the calculation of the amounts paid for holidays.

5:10 p.m.

Director, CPP Policy and Legislation, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Marianna Giordano

I am sorry, I did not hear you.

5:10 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

There have been changes concerning the amounts paid for holidays to employees and those on commission, have there not?

5:10 p.m.

Director, CPP Policy and Legislation, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Marianna Giordano

Can you tell me which section this is?

5:10 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

It is in the summary under "Simplification of holiday pay calculation." They explain that there is a new formula. Actually I can read to you what they say in the English version:

A new formula will be put in place to simplify the calculation of holiday pay. For most employees, holiday pay will be equal to 1/20th of wages earned—

5:15 p.m.

Director General, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Dominique LaSalle

I do not think that this is in the sections of concern to us.

5:15 p.m.

Director, CPP Policy and Legislation, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Marianna Giordano

It is not under the Canada Pension Plan.

5:15 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

Oh yes, pardon me.

That is fine, thank you.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

I'd like to thank our officials for being with us this afternoon. Thank you for your explanations, and for responding to our questions.

We have two divisions left. Are there any questions on division 11 or should we go to division 14?

We'll go to division 14, Agreement on Internal Trade Implementation Act.

Welcome to the committee. Thank you very much for being with us today. I assume you're going to be asked for one, so could we please have a very brief explanation. Members have briefing notes with them, but perhaps we could get a short explanation, and then we'll have questions from members.

5:15 p.m.

Krista Campbell Director General, Strategic Policy Branch, Department of Industry

Good afternoon. My name is Krista Campbell. I'm the director general of the strategic policy branch at Industry Canada. I'm accompanied by two colleagues, Catherine Foskett, the manager of the internal trade group, and Prue Thomson, senior adviser responsible for internal trade.

The Agreement on Internal Trade is a national agreement. It was signed in 1994 by, at the time, all 13 jurisdictions in Canada: the federal government, the provinces, and the two territories. Nunavut was not in existence at that time. The goal of the agreement is to eliminate barriers to the mobility of goods, labour, and services.

In December 2008 and June 2012, all council of internal trade ministers approved amendments to the dispute resolution procedures. Specifically what they approved were measures to strengthen the dispute resolution mechanism for complaints by a person against governments or between governments. All other AIT parties have either enacted or are in the process of enacting the required legislative changes to implement these amendments.

In effect, the proposed bill does three things. It enables the payment of monetary penalties from the consolidated revenue fund and ensures that such penalties would be handled in a way and enforceable similar to other penalties levied against the federal government through the Federal Court of Canada. It applies more strict criteria for appointing individuals to dispute resolution panels and other decision-making functions. It does some housekeeping by updating some of the provision numbers within the agreement and the legislation.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Thank you very much for that presentation.

Are there questions? Monsieur Mai.

5:15 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

Has the government estimated the costs and benefits related to strengthening the process for settling disputes pertaining to the Agreement...

5:15 p.m.

Director General, Strategic Policy Branch, Department of Industry

Krista Campbell

Sorry, I did not hear your question.

5:15 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

Have you evaluated the costs and benefits related to strengthening the process for settling disputes pertaining to the Agreement on Internal Trade?

5:15 p.m.

Director General, Strategic Policy Branch, Department of Industry

Krista Campbell

If I could just confirm, do you want to know whether we have evaluated some of the costs?

5:15 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

Yes, the costs.

5:15 p.m.

Director General, Strategic Policy Branch, Department of Industry

Krista Campbell

The Agreement on Internal Trade is a very consensus-based process where jurisdictions are encouraged to work out among themselves the process for identifying irritants to mobility of labour or goods or capital, and to work together to eliminate those barriers. On average there are only two or three cases that come forward that are actually disputes that need to come before a panel for a decision. The number of disputes that would go this far to result in monetary penalties would likely be very low.

5:20 p.m.

NDP

Hoang Mai NDP Brossard—La Prairie, QC

Do we have a number?

5:20 p.m.

Director General, Strategic Policy Branch, Department of Industry

Krista Campbell

On average, right now we have about three disputes a year that get this far. In all cases, even if the dispute gets to a panel, there are ways for governments to then reduce the barriers that are identified. It wouldn't necessarily lead to the imposition of penalties.