As a general rule. Perhaps you don't want to agree. As a general rule, they're the ones that have solid operations. The remaining 25%, the smallest ones, are on a less solid footing. If the current trend is to balance the operation of the government's contribution agreements, and it takes two to six months for a payment to be made... I'm not talking about the first one, I'm talking about the others, subsequently. The small retailers, the remaining 25% aren't on a sufficiently solid footing to operate that way. In spite of that, the department has decided that that's the normal process for dealing with 200 businesses that will be making regular claims. That means that, as you said, one person will be designated to handle that. That person will have to check all the requests one by one.
That person will have two, three, four...? These are perishable foodstuffs. If they're not paid for the following week, there will be a problem because retailers will have no more money. If they have no more money, they can't buy any more food. If it takes two months for them to be able to pay their small retailers, and the small retailers can't pay their suppliers, what happens to the population of the north?
I understand: you're saying that will be the problem, the retailer's fault. People will complain to it. Yes, but how will you guarantee that payment isn't made just as it's being made right now, that is to say in two to six months?