I'll choose not to answer the last question, but I will be pleased to answer the others.
With regard to eliminating the subsidy for non-perishable foods and non-foods, I simply want to recall that we previously showed before this committee that, from an economic standpoint, for both consumer and taxpayer, it wasn't a bargain to ship products such as diapers by air. It costs much less to send them by boat.
The storage issue was also raised. Additional storage expenses will definitely be incurred by retailers in the north.
However, I believe I've previously told the committee that, for less than $1,000, the shipping company will leave a container in the community to add to the storage capacity of the business.
I would also invite people to go and visit the retailers in the north to see how much space is reserved for carbonated drinks and their non-nutritional food items in the warehouses. We sent out a notice of change in May. These retailers should have changed storage space allocation priorities. They aren't the majority; I believe only two haven't done so. All the other retailers in the north have made the necessary changes to make room for products that will no longer be covered and to place their annual orders through Sealift, as it's called.
Then you mentioned checks. Canada Post doesn't check everything 100%. Only a small portion of foods are checked to ensure that their quality is still good when they reach the community. Canada Post doesn't check 100%. That's not part of the contract, part of the service offered.