Thank you for your question.
The Venice Principles include 20 or 25 criteria that provide a specific method of assessing whether each existing ombudsperson office complies with the principles of independence, impartiality, autonomy, ability to deliver its mandate without interference, and so on.
These principles relate in particular to accessibility to services. They also aim to verify that an ombudsperson has full autonomy and authority in terms of their needs and budget, as well as to determine their budget and needs, which is another extremely important criterion. They also cover the process of appointing the ombudsperson, including the selection of individuals to serve on the selection committee responsible for this appointment and the appropriateness of this process.
They also deal with everything related to autonomy in governance. There are parliamentary ombudsperson offices across Canada, including one in each province. These offices are completely independent. Each office is able to determine its own mandate and needs. It also reports directly to the legislature.
If I had to summarize the Venice Principles in simple terms, I would say that they aim to ensure that every client of an ombudsperson’s office feels that, if they have access to services, those services will be provided to them completely independently. This prevents the creation of false barriers or false perceptions among the people to whom the ombudsperson reports. For example, it would be unfortunate if an ombudsperson were perceived as part of the bureaucracy, because this could result in the loss of extremely relevant information from a member who fears that the office is not fully impartial or independent.
Established by the European Commission for Democracy through Law, the Venice Principles set out very rigorous standards for the establishment of ombudsperson offices.
At this time, my office is working with an expert in the field of ombudsperson services to review potential candidates who are capable of conducting a proper review of my office, so that an appropriate recommendation can be made to the minister on how the office of the ombudsperson for national defence and the Canadian Armed Forces should be governed in the future. This could result in very significant changes for the office.