Mr. Corbeil said that he didn't really consult outside specialists. However, since you did a good job of analyzing his remarks, I think he'll at least look at what was said here today. I assume we agree on this.
The committee may want to know the government's intentions. Since Mr. Bains may make a decision, I suggest that we invite Mr. Corbeil to appear before the committee again. He could then respond to the statements you made this morning, which correspond to what you believe. To some extent, you demolished Mr. Corbeil's arguments. I think it would be worthwhile to invite him again, or to invite the chief statistician responsible for Statistics Canada.
I think we all agree that we need to advance the cause. That doesn't mean trapping a person and attacking them. That's not what we want to do. We could submit a report, but as you said earlier, we don't want the report to be shelved. We don't want that to happen.
We need to see how the committee can exert enough pressure on the minister or the cabinet so that, when the time comes for them to make a decision, additional questions are included, regardless of which ones. Mr. Corbeil told us that he was responsible for the entire language issue and that the rest didn't concern him. Nonetheless, some issues affect many areas at Statistics Canada. We need to determine how we can exert pressure on Mr. Corbeil's manager so that, when he goes to the minister's office, he says that this is a top priority for Canada.