I see.
Mr. Lavoie, I read a problematic quote from a memo from Mr. Estabrooks. That was from March of last year. In April from last year there was this A5 in which Mr. Estabrooks says, and it's to you once again: “I can see no reason why it has taken months for Louis Alberti to give us a legal opinion. Are we assisting in some sort of cover-up...?”
You had mentioned earlier, when I asked you about the previous memo to you, that just prior to receiving it you had spoken with Mr. McConnell, I believe you said, and you were told the report should not be released. But then you got Mr. Estabrooks' memorandum, and now a month later you receive this A5. What exactly did you do? Did it go up the ranks? Did you talk to your supervisors about these two memos?