I trust that you haven't had access to any transcript and you haven't had access to the actual recording itself. I appreciate your memory. It may not be as sharp as it would be if I were asking you what you did last night, so I'll go through some of the details because the impression I'm hearing about you being so managerial-like and concerned regarding her well-being, etc., can be interpreted differently. I'm going to go through a couple of areas.
One thing that really caught my eye is your confirmation. This is a 17-minute conversation. Within the first minute and a half you used these words: “I know that you did exchange briefly with the CBSA in recent weeks. I know and you know they probably explained that they're carrying out an investigation on the allegations that are targeting two individuals within the CBSA.”
It's a very interesting use of the word “targeting” because that's precisely what the evidence has shown, that government and senior managers, deputy managers and ADMs, have looked for fall people to take the blame for this $60-million boondoggle.
There are consequences when people speak out against power, when people speak out against authority. They end up suspended, sometimes without pay. I'm glad you used the word “targeting” because that's the first confirmation that Justin Trudeau and his government and his public servants are deliberately targeting individuals to take the blame for this boondoggle. That's one observation.
The second observation is that you said their investigation includes everything that they're able to put their hands on and there are a couple of holes. Here's another interesting angle. You asked very early on whether Daly was threatened, and you didn't say that once. You didn't say it twice. You didn't say it three times. In 17 minutes, Ms. Bolduc, you reiterate, “If you've been threatened, now is your time to share details.”
I would well imagine the people you believed were threatening Diane Daly were her friends, Mr. Utano and Mr. MacDonald. Am I correct?