Perhaps I could make a brief intervention while we're on the topic. I think it's fair to say that using votes to challenge the Speaker's ruling as a dilatory strategy in legislatures was used to some effect in the Manitoba legislature. In fact, I believe it's still the case—if it's not, it was just changed in the last few years—that members of the Manitoba legislature are able to challenge the Speaker.
In 1995 when the Conservative government of the day undertook, successfully I might add, to privatize the Manitoba telecom system, the opposition of the day—the NDP was the opposition party at that time—used that very technique, if you will, to tie up the legislature for a month or more, I think. It might have been longer than a month when they just rang the bells every day.
Someone would prompt the Speaker to rule on something—disorder in the House—and the Speaker would stand up, make a ruling, they'd challenge the ruling, the bells would ring for 30 minutes or whatever it was to call members in for a vote, they'd vote, the Speaker's ruling would be upheld, typically, and then they would force another ruling by the Speaker. They did this for at least a month, and I think it might have been substantially longer than that. I'd have to check. In fact I didn't come prepared to talk about the episode in the Manitoba legislature surrounding the privatization of MTS, but I think it is to the point and a sign that this is just an ancient technique.
In these debates, the McGrath committee has come up a lot. If I'm not mistaken, it was the McGrath committee that actually recommended putting an end to challenges to the Speaker.
Incidentally, while I'm on the record, part of the reason I know that is because I grew up on stories of the McGrath committee. My father was a member of the McGrath committee, so it wasn't uncommon, from time to time, depending on the topic, that you could elicit, sometimes intentionally and sometimes not—get talking about something or use certain trigger words or themes—and all of a sudden you were into McGrath committee territory, and there were stories about the McGrath committee, and how this happened, and that happened, and, “We made this recommendation and that was because this had been going on, and it was in response to that”. If I'm not mistaken, it was actually the McGrath committee that made the decision that the Speaker should not be challenged by the House. That the Speaker should be elected by secret ballot was also a McGrath committee consideration.
Anyway, thank you for the parliamentary history.