Thank you, Chair.
Both witnesses today have zeroed in on a critical issue around training and jobs: Training should be seen as a means to an end. Training is valuable insofar as it prepares people for, and leads them to actually having, a job. One of the problems in this sort of infrastructure is that there's been too much mistaken thinking that sees training as an end in and of itself instead of a means to having a good career—as a means to having a job.
Both of you talked about different kinds of mismatches.
Mr. Tarr, you highlighted how, for unions in particular, you train people you can employ. You have a clear connection between training and employment. That connection, of course, does not exist in many other kinds of programs. You have people coming to you who have received other kinds of training and who have been disappointed that training has not led to a job.
Mr. Vultur, you talked about this phenomenon of people with post-secondary qualifications that they are unable to use in the labour market because of this mismatch between training and employment—people thinking about and treating training as an end in and of itself instead of a means to employment.
That's why one of the key pillars of the Conservative youth jobs plan is fixing training. The goal is to bring training into sharper alignment with the needs of the labour market. One of the things we propose is having relatively greater student financial assistance going towards students working to acquire in-demand skills. We've also proposed—and we proposed it long before the government started talking about it—significant increases in funding to UTIP. We believe that's important, and we've been proposing it for a very long time.
I want to hear from both of you. Maybe Mr. Vultur can go first.
How can we fix training to bring it in alignment with the labour market, in order to ensure people are being trained for jobs that exist and not just for the sake of training?