Thank you.
I'll start, but then I'll probably share my time here.
Thanks to the member on the other side for bringing up the example of the five colleges ESDC is looking into that perhaps are not following the rules correctly. It just speaks to what my colleague was talking about, the guardrails in the system.
Mr. Tarr, when you said earlier there were some colleges, we do have a system in place to look into how the recipients are receiving those funds and using those funds, and I think that points to that.
There's also been some discussion around action with respect to the actions we've taken to build things and to put people to work. I would just point to Build Canada Homes. I think we've been very clear that we're getting back into the business of building affordable homes. These are going to be real projects that are going to put real people to work. There's a first round of 4,000 that have been announced, and we're putting federal lands to use.
I am getting somewhere with this. It's the same thing with the Trans Mountain pipeline. I know that our Conservative colleagues like to say that we are the anti-energy party. We are not. We are the party for responsible development of our resources, and the Trans Mountain pipeline resulted in thousands of jobs during its construction and continues to help the energy industry out west.
I was intrigued by what my colleague, Mr. Genuis, said earlier about loans and grants to support students. We already have quite a generous federal loan program for students. I do very much like the idea of how we can better support students going into trades. Do you think that additional loans, or maybe better loans with better rates, or grants would be more helpful? Maybe it's a question for both of you.
Mr. Tarr, do you want to start?