Thank you.
Ms. Revine states that her position was cut. She said that under oath.
Here is a further quote: “...I was the only one who did not have a position...[identified]. In April, they gave me a letter saying that my position...[was being] abolished.”
And the deputy commissioner said, “I believe that on her doctor's orders she has been precluded from working within the office, and I believe there are issues there. We have accommodated her, and as I said, she has been working from home.”
Again, the testimony leads one to believe that this great favour was being done for Ms. Revine, who had problems, but you're suggesting to us that it was for structural reasons. Do you stand by this?
Let me ask you this question. Did anybody at all ever have any discussions with you in any regard at all with respect to Ms. Revine's position within the organization, or about her? Did anybody ever talk to you about her in any way, shape, or form—about her work, her job, her future, anything ever—anyone you can recall?