Thanks, Mr. Chair.
I've been here for only an hour, but my understanding is that the committee made a decision in principle on the substance of the parts of the bill. The firearm parts have been added to the bill.
Since the committee made that decision, all of these amendments are consequential to that original decision. You can't have a clause in the Criminal Code that talks about firearm parts in principle and then have the document the person needs to sign and fill out when issuing a release order not be consistent with the provision in the Criminal Code that talks about firearm parts. All of these votes are essentially just making those consequential amendments based on that original....
Now, the original decision could have been debated and we could have been for or against it. It was this committee that unanimously made that decision. All of the following things would be completely confusing and contrary to the Criminal Code if you didn't follow along and adopt all of the other amendments.
If that clarifies things, maybe we could then move on and adopt these amendments as my friend Mr. Julian has suggested.