Evidence of meeting #18 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was pipeline.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Before the committee

Julie Dabrusin  Minister of Environment and Climate Change
Hubbard  President, Impact Assessment Agency of Canada
Johnson  Deputy Minister, Department of the Environment
Nichols  Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment
McDermott  Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic Policy and International Affairs Branch, Department of the Environment
Drainville  Assistant Deputy Minister and Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Services and Financial Management Branch, Department of the Environment

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

How many billions of dollars of public money would have to be spent to capture the carbon emitted by a new oil sands pipeline? Is that even possible?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

You're asking me if it's possible to do what?

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

There are two questions.

First, how many billions of dollars of public money would it take to capture the additional emissions associated with production to fuel a one-million-barrel-a-day oil sands pipeline?

Second, is it possible, through your tax credits and carbon capture sequestration, to capture all the additional emissions associated with the additional production for this pipeline?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

Okay.

I was saying that, on that side, it's a project—

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

How many billions of dollars? Is it possible—

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

I don't have the project in front of me to check all the figures.

What I'm saying is that this is part of what was in the agreement—

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

You don't know how much it would cost.

Eric St-Pierre Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Mr. Chair, I have a point of order.

I'm having trouble following the discussion, because my colleague is asking a question, but he's not waiting for the minister's answer before continuing, so I can't hear his answer. Perhaps we should give the minister a little time to answer questions.

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Mr. St‑Pierre and honourable colleague, your comments would be relevant if you weren't speaking French. Since we're speaking French right now, you don't need the interpretation. I will even speak more slowly for you, so that you can hear my questions.

Madam Minister, are you still committed to meeting Canada's current greenhouse gas reduction target by 2030?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

Yes.

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

You're always committed to that.

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

Yes.

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Do you currently agree with Mr. Guilbeault, who says very clearly that we have to be able to look at ourselves in the mirror, that we have to be honest with Canadians and that we can no longer meet our 2030 targets? Do you agree with that statement?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

I'll just take a moment to say again that these are ambitious targets. We need to continue to do our work. We are committed to continuing to do the work necessary to meet those targets. So—

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Mr. Guilbeault says that we have to be honest with Canadians and tell them that we can no longer meet the target. So you don't agree with that statement.

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

Thank you, Mr. Bonin.

Mrs. Anstey, the floor is yours for five minutes.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Carol Anstey Conservative Long Range Mountains, NL

Thank you, Minister, for finally taking some time to meet with us today.

Minister, rural Canadians have been very clear that EV mandates make little sense in their small communities. The vast distances, harsh weather, high vehicle costs and limited charging infrastructure make adoption far more difficult.

Will you acknowledge to this committee that a rigid one-size-fits-all approach does not work for rural Canada, yes or no?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

As you know, we had consultations on the EV regulations that closed last month. We're reviewing them right now—

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Carol Anstey Conservative Long Range Mountains, NL

Yes or no, Minister? Do you agree that these mandates don't make sense for rural Canadians, yes or no?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

I just want to be clear. Do I believe that EVs can make sense in rural areas? We've seen it in other parts of the world, absolutely, but I just want to be clear that we're in a period when we're in review, after having completed consultations. Right now, we're still looking at how to make sure that we have the strongest policy going forward on zero-emissions vehicles.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Carol Anstey Conservative Long Range Mountains, NL

Thank you, Minister.

Brian Kingston from the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association told this committee that the government's pause of the 2026 EV mandate was “a recognition that this regulation isn't working and the targets are unfeasible”, noting that it would require a 200%-plus increase in sales in order to meet your 2026 requirement.

Based on that evidence, will you commit to permanently removing the EV mandates, yes or no?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

We are in a period of review, and I will be putting out new pieces—

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Carol Anstey Conservative Long Range Mountains, NL

Do you, as the environment minister, personally support removing the mandates?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

I support making sure that we have a policy that is based on the consultations and review, and it will be the strongest policy.

Do I believe in zero-emissions vehicles as part of the future right around this world? I do, absolutely.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Carol Anstey Conservative Long Range Mountains, NL

But will you support removing the mandates, yes or no?