Evidence of meeting #18 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was pipeline.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Before the committee

Julie Dabrusin  Minister of Environment and Climate Change
Hubbard  President, Impact Assessment Agency of Canada
Johnson  Deputy Minister, Department of the Environment
Nichols  Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment
McDermott  Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic Policy and International Affairs Branch, Department of the Environment
Drainville  Assistant Deputy Minister and Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Services and Financial Management Branch, Department of the Environment

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Are you in favour of this pipeline, yes or no?

Wade Grant Liberal Vancouver Quadra, BC

Mr. Chair, I have a point of order.

With the cross-dialogue, it's hard for me to keep up on the translation.

The Chair Liberal Angelo Iacono

Okay.

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

We'll slow down a little bit for you, Mr. Grant.

Wade Grant Liberal Vancouver Quadra, BC

Thank you.

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Do you think a new oil sands pipeline will help fight climate change, yes or no?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

Not all questions can be answered with a yes or no. The agreement includes measures on carbon capture, as well as sections on carbon pricing for industry. It has several sections. So it's not all black and white.

As Minister of the Environment, I have to make sure that we continue to reduce our emissions here in Canada, and that's what I'm doing every day.

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Okay.

As Minister of the Environment, do you believe that increasing oil sands production makes it possible to increase or reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

I'll answer you in two parts, because there are several parts to that question.

The first thing—

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

My question is simple, Madam Minister.

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

First, the agreement contains measures on carbon capture, which is part of this discussion, which is different—

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Let's assume that your agreement comes into force and that oil sands production increases in the country. Are you telling me that it will reduce emissions?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

No, what I'm saying is that—

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Then it increases emissions, right?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

—there are a number of things that need to be done to reduce our emissions.

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

I understand that you're good at communicating, but my questions are specific.

Do you think building a pipeline and increasing oil sands production makes it possible to increase or reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the country?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

I'll repeat my answer—

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Does it increase them or decrease them?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

The information I'm trying to give you is that—

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

I'm going to switch gears. Obviously, you don't want to answer this one.

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

I'm talking about the carbon capture measures that are part of this agreement.

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

How many billions of dollars of public money would have to be spent to offset those emissions with carbon capture?

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

It has to be paid for by the private sector.

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

So there is no money from the government for carbon capture and sequestration projects.

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

As I said before, there are tax credits, but—