No. I think he answered the question.
Evidence of meeting #52 for Finance in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was clauses.
A video is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #52 for Finance in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was clauses.
A video is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Director General, Economic Policy Development, Lands and Economic Development, Department of Indigenous Services
Thank you very much.
(Clause 268 agreed to on division)
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter
We'll go to division 32. We'll start on it. We have Ms. Underwood in to explain. It is regarding the increase to old age security pension and payment.
There are no amendments on clauses 269 to 271. We have amendments after that, but that's likely as far as we'll get.
Ms. Underwood, do you want to explain clauses 269 to 271 if you could? I think we'll probably agree to see them as one.
(On clauses 269 to 271)
Kristen Underwood Director General, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Mr. Chair, I might ask that Kevin Wagdin, who is in the waiting room, help me if there are some more technical questions. Perhaps he can be invited in while I start.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter
Okay.
Before you do, Mr. Clerk, can you check to see if it's okay if we go three minutes over? I don't want the thing to go dark when we're half done clause 271. We will adjourn after 271. Could you check and give me a wave?
Go ahead.
Director General, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Clause 269 is designed to ensure that the $500 one-time payment that is being proposed for the OAS pensioners aged 75 and older would not be included as income for GIS purposes. The one-time payment would be considered taxable income under the Income Tax Act. That would normally count as income for GIS.
Exempting this payment from the definition of income will ensure that the one-time payment made in August, 2021, will be treated similar to OAS and will not reduce a person's GIS beginning in July 2022.
Conservative
Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC
Who made the decision to make the payment in August of this year?
Director General, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
It was the decision of the government to make the payment this August. It was put in place as a transitional measure before the permanent increase happens next July.
Conservative
Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC
Did someone in the political realm direct you to choose August as a date to make this payment?
Director General, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
It is the decision of the government.
Liberal
Conservative
Conservative
Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC
I'm just wondering. Why would we want to set up a two-tiered system like this? Why are we treating seniors as junior-seniors and senior-seniors?
Is this also a government decision? Was there some analysis put into this that it makes sense to split our seniors into a two-tier system?
Director General, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
As we mentioned before, the decision to make the payment for older seniors, for those 75 years of age and older, was because of the greater vulnerability of this population due to the fact that they're outliving their savings, have a higher risk of becoming widows and widowers, and are further away from time in the paid workforce. All of those circumstances put older seniors at higher risk and greater vulnerability.
NDP
Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have two questions.
What percentage of seniors are between the ages of 65 and 75, and what percentage of those seniors 65 to 75 have income that is below the poverty line?
Director General, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
I'm just going to check and see if Kevin Wagdin has been able to join as well.
Kevin Wagdin Director, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Yes, I'm here, Kristen.
Liberal
Director, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
If you could repeat it, that would be wonderful.
NDP
Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC
Yes, it's to know the percentage of seniors who are aged 65 to 75 in Canada, and the percentage of seniors in that age group, 65 to 75, who have incomes at or below the poverty line.